Ultraconservative columnist and political activist Linda Harvey went on WorldNetDaily today to laud the decision the Trump administration made to cancel the strong guidelines designed to protect transgender students in public schools and bashed Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos for insisting that protecting “LGBTQ students” needs to be a “key priority for every school in America.”
Harvey says that DeVos “revealed that she’s a supporter of the destructive homosexual and gender confusion agenda,” and should resign over her “defense of these unconscionable behaviors.”
Harvey added that “the false pro-‘gay’ messages schools broadcast to children resemble the grooming a pedophile does before molesting a child,” claiming that when “these deviant desires are positioned to children as normal and natural, vulnerable kids more readily accept same-sex seduction by an adult or older peer.”
America’s new education leader showed her true colors on morality last week.
Unless DeVos moves away from defense of these unconscionable behaviors, she should resign from this position. Her school choice advocacy is laudable, but we need a leader who also supports sexual integrity for every child.
America doesn’t need a Department of Education anyway, but if it must exist, could it please not do harm to children? Could we at least not have a federal agency promoting sodomy to 11-year-olds in the guise of “civil rights” or “anti-bullying” programs? Or so-called “inclusive” sex education?
In fact, the false pro-“gay” messages schools broadcast to children resemble the grooming a pedophile does before molesting a child. When these deviant desires are positioned to children as normal and natural, vulnerable kids more readily accept same-sex seduction by an adult or older peer.
Is DeVos OK with setting children up for this? Many of today’s clueless educators are.
DeVos must believe these identities and behaviors are acceptable for children, and that boys invading girls’ showers is a “right” to be defended for some confused students. As such, she displays either woeful ignorance or jaded insensitivity.